Home  ›  What Was the Fake Liquid Inside 1980s Baby Bottles

What Was the Fake Liquid Inside 1980s Baby Bottles

Written By sábado, 12 de março de 2022 Add Comment Edit

Bottle containing liquid (usually milk or formula) to nourish infant

A modernistic, decorated, transparent plastic feeding bottle with bluish cap and silicone teat, anti-leakage plate and screw mounting

A baby bottle, nursing canteen, or feeding bottle is a bottle with an fastened teat (also called a nipple in the U.s.a.) on the summit opening, on which can exist suckled, and from thereby drank directly. It is typically used by infants and young children, or if someone cannot (without difficulty) drink from a loving cup, for feeding oneself or being fed. It tin can likewise be used to feed non-human being mammals.

Hard plastic is the most common cloth used, existence transparent, low-cal-weight, and resistant to breakage. Glass bottles have been recommended as being easier to clean, less likely to retain formula residues,[1] and relatively chemically inert.[2] Hybrid bottles using plastic on the outside and drinking glass inside have too been developed.[iii] Other materials used for baby bottles include food-grade stainless steel and silicone safety.[4] [5] [6]

Baby bottles can be used to feed expressed breast milk, infant formula,[7] or pediatric electrolyte solution.[8] A 2020 review reports that salubrious term infants, when breastfeeding or bottle‐feeding, "use similar tongue and jaw movements, tin can create suction and sequentially employ teat compression to obtain milk, with minimal differences in oxygen saturation and SSB patterns" (suck–swallow–breath patterns).[nine] Ill or pre-term babies may not be able to breastfeed or take a bottle finer and may need specialized care.[10] [7]

The blueprint characteristics of the bottle and teat have been institute to affect infant feeding and milk intake. Interactions between the babe and the caregiver feeding them affect the baby's milk intake during feeding. Whether the caregiver or the baby controls the feeding appears to impact the infant's power to learn to self‐regulate their milk intake.[9]

Proper cleaning and sterilization of bottles are recommended to avoid bacterial contamination and illness, particularly in areas where water quality and sanitary conditions are not good.

Design considerations [edit]

Newborn drinking milk from a bottle

A typical infant bottle typically has four components: the first is the main container or body of the bottle. A teat, or nipple, is the flexible function of the bottle that the baby will suck from, and contains a hole through which the milk will flow. The collar goes over the nipple and typically screws onto the neck of the canteen, forming a seal. About, but not all baby bottles will too accept a cap or travel cover that goes over the teat to go along information technology clean and to forbid small spills.[eleven] Some bottles may optionally have a dispensable liner.[9]

Design concerns for the making of baby bottles often reflect condom or comfort. A prophylactic babe canteen should not break, should not come apart easily into small or potentially harmful components, should not exist made of materials that pose a wellness run a risk, and should exist piece of cake to clean so as to avert bacterial contamination and illness.[12]

A bottle should besides be comfy for both caregiver and baby to utilise. Bottles that are lightweight and easy to hold can be desired past both babies and mothers. A multifariousness of shapes are available. The design of containers, nipples or teats may mimic the shape of the mother'southward breast. Designers may try to mimic the menstruum rate of breastfeeding: the infant should be able to get enough nourishment, but at the same fourth dimension not be overwhelmed or overfed.[xiii] [xiv] [xv]

Materials [edit]

Over fourth dimension a wide variety of materials have been used for infant feeding vessels (see History). The materials now most commonly used in baby bottle containers are glass and some types of plastics. Food-course stainless steel and silicone prophylactic are also used. Each of these iv materials—plastic, glass, silicone and stainless steel—has advantages and disadvantages.[6] The standard materials used in teats/nipples are latex condom and silicone.[16]

A number of countries take regulations about allowable nutrient contact materials. Ideally, the cloth making up the canteen should react equally little equally possible with the cloth in the bottle. No material is completely inert, but glass and stainless steel are relatively neutral materials which tend to remain stable and not interact with foods.[ii] The disadvantages of glass are that it tends to be heavy and can interruption more than hands.[17]

Plastics are lightweight and resistant to breaking.[17] Manufacturers find them easy to course into a variety of shapes.[18] A broad variety of plastics have been adult, some of which are non well understood in terms of reactivity. Some plastics accept been found to be reactive with fluids such equally breast milk and infant formula. Chemicals may "leach" from a canteen into the substance information technology holds. In addition, plastics may be more than likely to suspension down when heated or cooled, for case, when being heated in a microwave or being boiled to sterilize them.[xix] [20]

Polycarbonate plastic was often used in baby bottles before 2011, and is all the same used in some countries.[21] Polycarbonates comprise Bisphenol A.[22] Since 2008,[2] at least 40 countries have banned the apply of plastics containing Bisphenol A in baby bottles due to safety concerns (see Regulation).[23] Bottles made of polycarbonate may be marked as "#7 PC".[24]

Bisphenol S (BPS) and Bisphenol F (BPF) have been used every bit substitutes for BPA. They are structurally similar. Comparisons of BPA, BPS and BPF have found that these chemicals have like dominance and activeness to BPA and may pose similar dangers in terms of endocrine-disrupting effects.[25] This has led to criticisms of the chemical industry[26] and for calls to deal with bisphenols in groups, not individually. In 2021, the Canadian government agencies Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and Health Canada (HC) held consultations with the goal of group 343 known BPA analogs and functional alternatives.[27]

Polyethersulfone plastic (Foot) does non contain BPA but does include Bisphenol S (BPS).[28] An cess of a multifariousness of different infant bottles in utilise in 2016, reported iv bottles to be of "high business", 14 bottles to be of "business organisation"; and only half dozen bottles to be of "no business concern" These of "no business organisation" included two polyamide (PA) and two polyethersulfone (Human foot) bottles, a stainless steel canteen, and one of the 17 polypropylene (PP) bottles tested.[29]

Phthalates, found in polyvinyl chloride (PVC), are another area of concern.[30] Referred to as "everywhere chemicals" because they are so common, phthalates brand plastic more flexible, and accept been used in pacifiers and nipples or teats for bottles.[31] [32] Phthalates take been banned from use in feeding bottles in the EU.[33] In the Usa, there have been repeated calls for the removal of phthalates past the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and others.[34] [35] [30] Their use in children's toys and products was somewhat restricted by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.[36] [37] Plastics labeled #3 may leach phthalates.[37] Latex rubber nipples may incorporate phthalates, so silicone nipples may be recommended instead. Packaging may indicate whether a production is "BPA-costless" or "phthalate-complimentary".[31]

Plastics may degrade over time in other ways, There are concerns that minor beads of plastic may exist released into fluids from some types of plastic bottles.[38] In 2020 researchers reported that babe feeding bottles made out of polypropylene caused microplastics exposure to infants ranging from 14,600 to 4,550,000 particles per capita per twenty-four hour period in 48 regions with contemporary training procedures. Microplastics release is higher with warmer liquids and like with other polypropylene products such as lunchboxes.[39] [40] [41] Medical experts have suggested reducing exposure to microplastics by not shaking plastic bottles or exposing them to high temperatures. Some recommend using culling materials such as glass, silicone, or stainless steel.[42]

For nipples, silicone is clear, durable and slightly harder than latex. Natural rubber latex teats are elastic, tear resistant and may feel softer. Latex tin can absorb odors, while silicone does not. Latex can break down if exposed to sunlight. Some people have allergies to latex.[sixteen]

Size [edit]

Bottles tend to come in standard sizes, often 4 US fluid ounces (120 ml) and eight The states fluid ounces (240 ml). Smaller bottles may be lighter and easier to concur and are oftentimes used with younger, smaller infants. At that place are concerns that larger bottles may lead to over-feeding, since parents are likely to encourage a babe to "finish" a canteen during a feeding.[43]

The meridian-to-width ratio of bottles is high (relative to developed cups) because it is needed to ensure the contents flood the teat when used at normal angles; otherwise the babe will drink air. Still, if the bottle is too tall, it easily tips. There are asymmetric bottles that ensure the contents inundation the teat if the bottle is held at a sure management.[ citation needed ]

Shape [edit]

The shape of the canteen is related to both ease of apply and ease of cleaning (see History). Designers sometimes advise that naturalistic designs will mean that babies can transition between chest or canteen without issues.[43] [13] Other bottles have been invented with unique shapes designed to speed upwards the warming and cooling of breast milk, saving time, reducing bacterial growth, and reducing exposure to temperatures that tin harm the nutrients in breast milk.[44]

"Anti-colic" bottles take been put forward with the goal of reducing "gassiness" and distress when feeding. Designs often seek to minimize the sucking in of air by the baby while feeding. Some bottles endeavour to minimize the mixing of air into the milk within the bottle. At the same time, information technology is desirable to avert creating an internal vacuum as the infant sucks out fluids, since this will make it harder to feed. Designs may rely on the bottle'south shape or incorporate different types of "venting".[nine] [45] [13] [46]

A "vented" canteen is likewise sometimes marked equally an "anti-colic" canteen.

Some vented bottles, likewise as bottles which apply a collapsible liner collapses as the formula is drained, have been assessed favorably. They were reported to be comparable to a breastfeeding group in terms of milk intake, sucking patterns, and oxygenation.[9]

A 2012 study comparison two types of vented bottles with anti-vacuum features institute no differences in babe growth between randomized groups. "Bottle A", a partial anti-vacuum design, was rated by parents as easier to get together and clean. Infants fed using "Canteen A" were reported to engage in less "fussing", but no difference were plant in "crying" or "colic" or in rates of ear infection.[47]

Wellness recommendations for the storage and handling of human milk typically focus on preventing the growth of dangerous bacteria, just some inquiry is too being done on diet. Experimental studies accept shown a deposition of retinol (Vitamin A) and α-Tocopherol (Vitamin E) content dependent upon the formation of bubbles in expressed breast milk and in formula. Vii models of bottles were studied, from six companies. Less degradation occurred when using a bottle feeding organisation designed to minimize the mixing of air with the bottle's contents.[48]

Teat flow rate [edit]

Teat characteristics can also take important implications for infant's sucking blueprint and milk intake. Milk catamenia rate is defined every bit "the charge per unit at which milk moves from the bottle nipple into the babe's mouth during bottle-feeding."[49] Characteristics such every bit the shape of the nipple and the way it is perforated may impact menses rate and the coordination of sucking, swallowing and animate during feeding.[9] [49]

Unfortunately, categorization and labeling of teats to indicate flow charge per unit is neither standardized nor consequent. In that location is pregnant variability betwixt and within brands and models.[nine] [49] In ane study, nipples labeled "Deadening" or "Newborn" (0–three months) had flow rates ranging from ane.68 mL/min to 15.12 mL/min."The name assigned to the nipple type does not provide clear data to parents attempting to choose a nipple".[49] This may be of actress business in the instance of delicate infants.[49] Specialized teats are available for infants with fissure palate.[l]

Variations and accessories [edit]

Bottles may be designed to attach directly to a breast pump for a complete "feeding system" that maximizes the reuse of the components. Such systems include a variety of drinking spouts for when the child is older. This converts the canteen into a sippy cup, a cup with hat and spout for toddlers, which is intermediate betwixt a baby bottle and an open superlative loving cup. Bottles that are function of a feeding arrangement may include handles that tin can be attached. The ring and teat may be replaced by a storage lid.[ citation needed ]

Accessories for bottles include cleaning brushes, or bottle brushes, sterilizers, and drying racks. Brushes may be peculiarly designed for a specific manufacturer's bottles and teats. Bottle sterilizers apply different techniques for sterilization, including ultraviolet light, boiling water, and hot steam.

Bottle warmer with thermostat

Canteen warmers warm previously made and refrigerated formula. Coolers designed to fit a specific manufacturer's bottles are available to keep refrigerated formula cold. Special formula powder containers are available to store pre-measured amounts of formula so that caregivers tin pre-fill up bottles with sterile water and mix in the pulverisation easily. The containers are typically designed to stack together so that multiple pre-measured amounts of formula powder may exist transported as a unit.[ citation needed ]

Institutions can purchase ready-to-feed formula in containers that tin can be used every bit infant bottles.[51] The lid screws off and is replaced by a dispensable teat when the formula is set up to be used. This avoids storing the formula with the teat and possibly clogging the teat holes when formula is splashed within the canteen and dries.[ citation needed ]

Use [edit]

Cleaning and sterilization [edit]

Sterilization is a standard exercise to prevent development of leaner and resulting illness, that is more than constructive than sanitization.[52] The Australian government and the United kingdom's National Health Service guidelines recommend sterilization of baby bottles and other equipment either by using a cold water sterilizing solution such every bit past Milton sterilizing fluid, by steam sterilizing, or by boiling.[53] [54] [55] [56] It is important to clean and sterilize all parts of a bottle including containers, teats, and screw caps.[55] [57]

The United states of america Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, suggests that it may exist sufficient to make clean bottles with soap and h2o, in a dishwasher or by paw.[58] This recommendation is based on the assumption that water supplies are clean and sanitation standards are high.[59] [60] Some states, such equally Illinois, proceed to recommend sterilization in add-on to washing.[61] Alberta, Canada recommends sterilizing bottles until an infant is at least four months one-time.[62]

However, there is evidence that leaner such every bit Eastward. coli can thrive in biofilms which form on the interior walls of the bottles. Gentle rinsing is not plenty to prevent this. Even in developed areas, contagion continues to be a business concern.[63] [64] In 2009 in the United Kingdom, researchers plant contamination with Staphylococcus aureus in 4% of the baby bottles that parents reported were ready to fill up later cleaning and disinfecting.[65] [66]

In lower-resource settings, risks of exposure to unsafe respiratory and enteric infections are higher.[63] A written report of children admitted to hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, found that 52.ane% of the bottles their caregivers considered make clean were actually contaminated. This occurred even though caregivers reportedly followed many of the recommended cleaning practices for cleaning and sterilizing bottles. The nearly common fault was to boil the bottles for less than the minimum time recommended by WHO.[67] [68]

Research into the preparation of babe formula in Republic of korea indicates significant levels of contamination can exist transmitted through the treatment of spoons and other utensils. Spoons, after being touched, were frequently left in the formula container, allowing bacteria to spread to the formula in the container. C. sakazakii, S. enterica, and S. aureus, all of which are potentially fatal, were able to surviving for weeks in contaminated babe formula.[69]

Understanding how recommendations are interpreted is important: in one study, leaving a canteen in water that had been previously boiled in a kettle was believed to be "humid" the bottle. Researchers emphasize that health providers need to amend educate caregivers; and that practical methods of canteen hygiene need to be suited to apply in field settings. For example, in Republic of peru, easy-to-adopt practices like using a bottle brush and detergent gave greater advantages than hard-to-achieve procedures like humid a bottle.[63] WHO (which strongly recommends breastfeeding) notes that in cases where bottle feeding is to occur, much ameliorate education is needed on how to use bottles.[lxx]

Age-appropriate use [edit]

Nipples (teats) are typically subdivided past flow rate, with the slowest flow rate recommended for premature infants and infants with feeding difficulties. However, flow rates are not standardised and vary considerably between brands.[71] [49]

The NHS recommends a sippy cup or beaker be introduced by 6 months and the use of bottles discontinued by 1 yr.[72] The AAP recommends that the cup be introduced by one twelvemonth of age and that the use of the canteen by discontinued by 18 months.[73] The apply of bottles is discouraged beyond two years of age by most health organisations as prolonged utilise tin cause molar decay.[74] [75] Early childhood caries (ECC) is also a business organization when considering how long breastfeeding should continue.[76]

Regulation [edit]

While infant formula is highly regulated in many countries, baby bottles are non. Only the materials of the teat and canteen itself are specifically regulated in some countries (due east.g. British Standards BS 7368:1990 "Specification for babies' elastomeric feeding bottle teats"[77]). In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates teats and the bottle materials.[78] [79] [80] [81]

In 1985 the FDA restricted allowable levels of nitrosamines (many of which are carcinogens) released from bottle teats.[82] Tests of bottle nipples available in the USA, Singapore, West Germany, England, Nihon and Korea propose that levels of nitrosamines in most rubber infant bottle teats are within recommended standards.[83] [84]

Another chemical that has been regulated is Bisphenol A (BPA), described as an endocrine disruptor in 1991.[85] Ongoing research into the possible effects of BPA at levels of exposure far below the U.S. government's BPA safety standards has led to concerns well-nigh the safety of plastics, including baby bottles. A 1999 Consumer Reports study showed that some polycarbonate infant bottles released unsafe amounts of BPA.[86] [87] [88] Concerns about BPA have been supported by further piece of work.[89] [90] [91] (Enquiry into the effects of BPA has often been hotly contested and controversial[92] and issues accept been raised over inquiry biases due to industry funding and conflicts of interest due to close ties between government consultants and BPA manufacturers.[89] [86] [90]) One result has been proposals to modify the testing epitome for assessment of endocrine-disrupting chemicals.[89]

Research and public force per unit area take led to bans on the utilise of Bisphenol A in bottles and cups to be used past children.[78] [93] [86] In 2008 Walmart announced that it would stop selling baby bottles and food containers containing BPA.[85] Every bit of 2017, these were applied in at to the lowest degree 40 countries.[23] Canada classified BPA as "toxic" in 2008 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.[89] In 2011 utilise of bisphenol A in baby bottles was forbidden in all Eu countries,[94] [95] in China,[86] in Malaysia, and Due south Africa.[96] In July 2012, the FDA stated that BPA would no longer used in babe bottles and sippy cups, in response to a petition from the American Chemical science Quango stating that this was at present in line with industry practice.[97] [98] Other countries such as Argentine republic[99] and Brazil followed suit by prohibiting bisphenol A in baby bottles.[96] Korea has extended its BPA ban to include all children's utensils, containers and packaging as of January 2020.[100] In that location are calls for increased regulation of BPA in India.[23] [101]

History [edit]

Throughout most of human being history, baby nutrition has primarily depended on the availability of the child's mother or a moisture nurse to breastfeed the infant.[102] Behavior and behaviors relating to infant feeding also vary widely beyond countries, cultures and times. Mothers and caregivers have as well sought additional ways to feed children, sometimes referred to as "hand feeding".[103] [104] Every bit early as 1500BCE, Egyptian pottery shows images of women breastfeeding their babies and also using animal horns to feed them.[105]

Containers with hard spouts date to early on in recorded fourth dimension, as bear witness by archeological finds (run across paradigm). The starting time vessels known to exist used for feeding infants had an opening at ane stop for filling the bottle, and a second at the other to be put into the baby's mouth.[106] [107] [108] Examination of the organic residues on ancient ceramic babe bottles shows that they were used as early on as 1200BCE to feed babies with animal milk.[107] [108]

Around 250BCE to 300BCE the Egyptians developed the ability to blow glass and the Romans blew articulate feeding bottles of drinking glass, merely these did not retain obtain long-term popularity. Leather and wood were as well used.[106] [109] [110]

Early medieval baby feeding bottle from Castkedyke Cemetery, Barton upon Humber, from a display at the North Lincolnshire Museum

By the 1700s baby-feeding vessels such as the feeding-cups, bubby-pots, and sucking-pots were likewise being fabricated[105] [110] from materials that included pewter, tin, and silver.[102]

Baby with feeding bottle, 1922

In the 19th century, artificial feeding brainstorm to supersede wet nursing, and by 1900, wet nursing no longer existed equally an organized profession.[102] Changes to the feeding of infants were both socially and technologically driven. With industrialization, more mothers worked outside the domicile and could less easily breastfeed their children. Technological changes including the pattern of artificial feeding methods and the preparation of animal milks and other milk substitutes supported a transition to artificial feeding. but with mixed success. Understanding of both nutrition and sanitation lagged behind the introduction of artificial feeding methods, contributing to extremely high baby mortality rates in the Victorian era.[105] [111] [112] [113] [104] [114] [115]

Alexandra feeding bottle, sold with a screw glass stopper, early 1900s

In the United States, the starting time glass nursing canteen was patented by C.M. Windship in 1841. Information technology was intentionally shaped like the mother's breast. In 1845 the Alexandra Feeder was marketed in England.[106] [116] In Paris, the "Biberon" was introduced past One thousand. Darbo: it was reported to be quite pop in a review from 1851.[106] [117] As the group American Collectors of Baby Feeders notes, by "the late 1800s a large variety of glass nursing bottles were produced in the U.s.", and the U.S. Patent Office had issued more than than 200 patents for various designs of nursing bottles by the 1940s—designed to prevarication flat or stand up straight, with openings on their sides or ends, with detachable or permanently attached nipples, etc.[118]

Advertisement for Burr's Improved Nursing Canteen, i brand of "murder bottle"

The design of infant bottles and particularly the ease of cleaning them had potentially serious consequences for the health of the children using them. Estimates of babe bloodshed propose that 20-30% of infants died in the beginning year of life during the late Victorian era.[119] [115] [112] During the 1890s, at a time when England's childhood mortality rates (ages 1-5) were declining, infant mortality rates actually rose.[120] [121] A bottle with a long Indian rubber tube catastrophe in a teat remained popular until the 1920s because even very young babies could feed independently. The feeding tubes could be bought separately and were sometimes used with empty whiskey or medicine bottles. Almost impossible to keep clean, this type has been nicknamed the "murder bottle".[111] [105]

A "banana" baby bottle (c. 1950s). The double-concluded bottles did not have two teats: they had a teat and a valve. Photo credit: Time Tunnel museum.

Allen and Hanbury introduced a new canteen design with a removable valve and teat on the two ends in 1894, and an improved model, the Allenbury, in 1900. This "banana" canteen was easier to make clean. Sometimes referred to as the "hygienic bottle", it helped to improve survival rates. Similar bottles were introduced by other manufacturers and remained pop from the 1900s to the 1950s.[122] Eventually increased agreement of the causes and transmission of affliction and improvements in medicine and public health began to reduce infant mortality.[123] [124]

Heat-resistant Pyrex bottles were introduced to the American and British markets at different times. Pyrex bottles were first introduced in the United States by Corning Inc. in 1922. They were offered in iii shapes (narrow cervix, wide oral cavity, and flat) and multiple sizes, for a total of ten varieties. By 1925, the production line had been express to a small subset of the original shapes and sizes.[125] In the 1950s a upright Pyrex canteen with a narrow neck was introduced. In the 1960s a wide-neck version was finally introduced to the Great britain market.[122] The design of upright bottles with a wider mouth meant that they could exist more easily cleaned, and sterilized in batches.[126]

Soft nipples of various materials were introduced early in the history of feeding (due east.g., leather, cork, sponge, dried cow'due south teat filled with cloth). Many were very hard to clean and when unsanitary could pose a serious threat to infant health.[102] [106] [109] [110] Although Elijah Pratt of New York patented the first condom nipple in 1845,[106] information technology took until the 20th century before materials and engineering improved sufficiently to permit manufacture of a soft nipple that was practical for employ. The invention of safety (1840s) provided a material that was soft. Early black Indian rubber "had a very strong pungent olfactory property", and did not survive repeated exposures to hot water. All the same, past the early 1900s more pleasing safety nipples could exist manufactured in volume and could withstand the oestrus of sterilization.[122] [110]

During the 1940s nurse Adda K. Allen filed for multiple patents relating to the design of baby bottles,[127] including the first dispensable collapsible liner for a infant bottle.[128] Her patent was one of many attempts to design a canteen to limit swallowing of air during feeding, and reduce gastric upset and spitting up. A plastic bottle with a disposable liner was eventually tested at George Washington University Hospital and marketed by Playtex.[129]

Innovations such as the introduction of a working check valve in the nipple (to provide unidirectional flow of the liquid food) appeared as early as 1948 in a patent to J.W. Less.[130] This technology was picked upwardly by others including Owens-Illinois Glass,[131] eventually making its fashion into Gerber and all modernistic pressure-balancing canteen designs.[132] It is also used for adult drinking cups and various other products requiring fluid catamenia under vacuum.[133]

The modern business of producing bottles in the adult globe is substantial. For 2018, the global baby bottle market was valued at ii.6 billion USD.[134] [135] In 1999 it was reported that the UK "feeding and sterilising equipment sector ... stands at £49m… [where] [south]ales of feeding bottles account for 39%" or £nineteen.1m of that marketplace.[136]

Controversy [edit]

The 2014 summary policy statement of the American University of Pediatrics (AAP) makes no specific mention of bottle feeding, but makes articulate that "[b]reastfeeding and man milk are the normative standards for babe feeding and nutrition", and refers to decisions regarding the supply of infant diet every bit "a public wellness issue and non simply a lifestyle choice… [g]iven the documented curt- and long-term medical and neurodevelopmental advantages of breastfeeding".[137] [138] The AAP policy recommends breastfeeding exclusively for half dozen months, continuing it with introduction of complementary foods, with an overall duration of "one year or longer as mutually desired by female parent and infant".[138] The body of the policy argument notes and cites literature indicating that, in improver to the importance of female parent's milk, the fashion of the nutrient delivery has implications: that "breastfed infants self-regulate intake volume", whereas bottle-fed infants receiving expressed breast milk or formula have "increased canteen elimination, poorer cocky-regulation, and excessive weight gain in late infancy", and that such early practice of self-regulation correlate with adult patterns of weight proceeds (ibid.).

The AAP policy notes that "[chiliad]edical contraindications to breastfeeding are rare".[138] The transmission of some viral diseases through breastfeeding is reportedly preventable, east.g., by expressing chest milk and subjecting information technology to Holder pasteurization.[139]

In response to public pressure felt from policies de-emphasizing bottle- and formula-feeding, efforts take arisen to support mothers experiencing physiologic or other difficulties in breastfeeding, and sites include individual views that endeavour to weaken the scientific case of the AAP policy;[140] a book of the personal experiences and views of one mother committed to canteen/formula feeding, Bottled Up, by Suzanne Barston, has appeared.[141]

Meet also [edit]

  • Infant Friendly Hospital Initiative
  • Breastfeeding promotion
  • Breastfeeding contraindications
  • Haberman Feeder
  • Infant formula
  • International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes
  • List of bottle types, brands and companies

References [edit]

  1. ^ Chen, YL; Kuan, WH (December 2014). "Is a Plastic or Drinking glass Feeding Bottle Easier to Be Cleaned?". Iranian Journal of Public Health. 43 (12): 1716–7. PMC4499096. PMID 26171367.
  2. ^ a b c Everts, Sarah (August 31, 2009). "Chemicals Leach From Packaging Food and drugs just can't leave their wrappings behind". Chemic & Engineering News. 87 (35). doi:10.1021/cen-v087n035.p011. Retrieved 6 December 2021.
  3. ^ "Glass vs. Plastic Baby Bottles". WebMD . Retrieved 6 Dec 2021.
  4. ^ Risk Assessment Studies Report No. 47 Safety Issues of Babe Bottles and Children's Tableware (PDF). Middle for Nutrient Safety, The Authorities of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. January 2012. pp. 43–51. Retrieved 6 Dec 2021.
  5. ^ "Non-toxic Baby Bottles:: Plastic, Drinking glass, Stainless Steel, or Silicone?". Gimme the Expert Stuff. viii February 2018. Retrieved half dozen December 2021.
  6. ^ a b "The Best Plastic-Complimentary Bottles For Babies". www.thetot.com . Retrieved xvi December 2021.
  7. ^ a b More, Judy (2021). "Affiliate 11: Preterm Infants". Infant, child and adolescent diet : a practical handbook (Second ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 147–161. ISBN9781000369748 . Retrieved six December 2021.
  8. ^ "Pedialyte for Babies: Benefits, Dosage, and Safety". Healthline. 26 May 2020. Retrieved vi December 2021.
  9. ^ a b c d eastward f g Kotowski, Judith; Fowler, Cathrine; Hourigan, Christina; Orr, Fiona (April 2020). "Canteen‐feeding an baby feeding modality: An integrative literature review". Maternal & Kid Diet. 16 (two): e12939. doi:ten.1111/mcn.12939. PMC7083444. PMID 31908144.
  10. ^ "Nutrition and Fluids for Your Baby in the NICU". The Children'due south Infirmary of Philadelphia. 23 August 2014. Retrieved vi Dec 2021.
  11. ^ "How to Clean, Sanitize, and Store Infant Feeding Items". CDC.gov. 2018-10-31. Retrieved 2020-05-22 .
  12. ^ "Chicco Launches The Starting time Hybrid Infant Bottle Ever". CISION. April 30, 2021. Retrieved eighteen December 2021.
  13. ^ a b c Jenik, Alejandro; Fustiñana, Carlos; Marquez, Maritza; Mage, David; Fernandez, Gloria; Mariani, Gonzalo (2012). "A New Bottle Design Decreases Hypoxemic Episodes during Feeding in Preterm Infants". International Journal of Pediatrics. 2012: 531608. doi:x.1155/2012/531608. PMC3385645. PMID 22778757.
  14. ^ Marshall, Jeanne; Clarke, Sally; Escott, Catherine; Pados, Britt Frisk (1 August 2021). "Assessing the flow rate of different bottles and teats for neonates with feeding difficulties: An Australian context". Periodical of Neonatal Nursing. 27 (4): 285–290. doi:x.1016/j.jnn.2020.11.014. ISSN 1355-1841. S2CID 229484424. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  15. ^ Pados, Britt F.; Park, Jinhee; Thoyre, Suzanne M.; Estrem, Hayley; Aught, W. Brant (November 2015). "Milk Period Rates From Canteen Nipples Used for Feeding Infants Who Are Hospitalized". American Journal of Spoken language-Linguistic communication Pathology. 24 (iv): 671–679. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-15-0011. ISSN 1058-0360. PMC4698468. PMID 26172340.
  16. ^ a b Layton, Vanessa. "Baby Bottle Teats: What'south the Difference Between Latex & Silicone?". How-do-you-do Charlie . Retrieved 20 Dec 2021.
  17. ^ a b "Using Glass Baby Bottles – Pros and Cons". A Mum Reviews. 27 July 2015. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  18. ^ "Guide to Manufacturing Processes for Plastics". Formlabs . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  19. ^ Pant, Mahendra K.; Ahmad, Abul H.; Naithani, Manisha; Pandey, Hari Due south.; Pandey, Monika; Pant, Jayanti (13 May 2020). "Effect of Exposure of Plastic Infant Feeding Bottle Leached H2o on Biochemical, Morphological and Oxidative Stress Parameters in Rats". Toxics. 8 (ii): 34. doi:10.3390/toxics8020034. ISSN 2305-6304. PMC7355934. PMID 32414073.
  20. ^ "Infant's Toxic Canteen" (PDF). The Piece of work Group for Safe Markets (U.South.) . Retrieved 18 December 2021.
  21. ^ Bashir, A. B.; Audu, A. A. (2021). "Extraction and Quantification of Bisphenol-A Level in Baby Polycarbonate Feeding Bottles using High Operation Liquid Chromatography Technique". ChemSearch Periodical. 12 (1): 34–twoscore. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  22. ^ "Bisphenol A". New York Land Section of Wellness . Retrieved 17 Dec 2021.
  23. ^ a b c Mahamuni, Duraisamy; Shrinithivihahshini, Nirmaladevi Dhandayudapani (2017). "Demand for regulatory policies in India, on the use of bisphenol A in nutrient contact plastic containers". Current Science. 113 (5): 861–868. doi:10.18520/cs/v113/i05/861-868. ISSN 0011-3891. Retrieved 1 December 2021.
  24. ^ "Protect your babe from BPA (Bisphenol A)". Republic of Massachusetts. 2021. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  25. ^ Rochester, Johanna R.; Bolden, Ashley L. (July 2015). "Bisphenol Southward and F: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the Hormonal Activeness of Bisphenol A Substitutes". Environmental Health Perspectives. 123 (vii): 643–650. doi:10.1289/ehp.1408989. ISSN 0091-6765. PMC4492270. PMID 25775505. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  26. ^ Ben-Jonathan, Nira; Hugo, Eric R. (1 Jan 2016). "Bisphenols Come in Different Flavors: Is "S" Better Than "A"?". Endocrinology. 2016 (1): 23–25. doi:ten.1210/en.2016-1120. PMC4816743. PMID 27035769. The real issue is that the industry is replacing a toxic chemical with another, yet untested chemical, which will require large investments of research funds to conduct out applicable studies
  27. ^ "Canada proposes grouping BPA analogues, alternatives". Food Packaging Forum. thirteen January 2021. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  28. ^ Agri-Food; Veterinary Authorisation of Singapore (27 Feb 2020). "Condom of plastic baby bottles". Nutrient for Thought. Singapore Government. Retrieved 17 Dec 2021.
  29. ^ Groh, Ksenia (9 September 2016). "Health risks of 'BPA-complimentary' baby bottles | Food Packaging Forum". Food Packaging Forum . Retrieved 18 December 2021.
  30. ^ a b LaMotte, Sandee (February xx, 2021). "Chemicals in plastics damage babies' brains and must be banned, expert group says". CNN . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  31. ^ a b "BPA and phthalates". Westchester County Department of Wellness . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  32. ^ "Phthalates" (PDF). Zero Breast Cancer . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  33. ^ Mo, Chuiyan (v Nov 2020). "Babe Feeding Bottle Standards & Regulations in the European union: An Overview". Compliance Gate . Retrieved xx December 2021.
  34. ^ "Chemicals". U.S. Consumer Production Safety Commission . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  35. ^ "CPSC Prohibits Certain Phthalates in Children's Toys and Kid Intendance Products". U.South. Consumer Product Safety Committee . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  36. ^ "Phthalates Were Removed from Babies' Toys in U.S., simply Infants However Get Them in Excess from Foods". Baby Intendance Journals. 29 July 2014. Retrieved 17 Dec 2021.
  37. ^ a b Lee, Gretchen. "Phthalates: What yous need to know". BabyCenter . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  38. ^ Kannan, Kurunthachalam; Vimalkumar, Krishnamoorthi (2021). "A Review of Human Exposure to Microplastics and Insights Into Microplastics as Obesogens". Frontiers in Endocrinology. 12: 978. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.724989. ISSN 1664-2392. PMC8416353. PMID 34484127.
  39. ^ Carrington, Damian (19 October 2020). "Canteen-fed babies swallow millions of microplastics a twenty-four hours, report finds". The Guardian . Retrieved 9 November 2020.
  40. ^ Trinity College Dublin (October 19, 2020). "High levels of microplastics released from baby feeding bottles during formula prep". phys.org . Retrieved 9 November 2020.
  41. ^ Li, Dunzhu; Shi, Yunhong; Yang, Luming; Xiao, Liwen; Kehoe, Daniel One thousand.; Gun'ko, Yurii K.; Boland, John J.; Wang, Jing Jing (November 2020). "Microplastic release from the degradation of polypropylene feeding bottles during baby formula training". Nature Food. 1 (11): 746–754. doi:10.1038/s43016-020-00171-y. hdl:2262/94127. ISSN 2662-1355. S2CID 228978799. Retrieved 9 Nov 2020.
  42. ^ "Are Plastic Babe Bottles Safe?". Cleveland Clinic . Retrieved 2 Dec 2021.
  43. ^ a b Hua, Vanessa (23 September 2014). "Building a Improve Infant Canteen". re:class . Retrieved 18 December 2021.
  44. ^ Kavilanz, Parija (26 October 2018). "A tired dad and his hungry infant led to a radical new baby bottle". CNN. CNN. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  45. ^ Amereh, Meitham; Kheiri, Sina; Kim, Keekyoung; Li, Ri; Akbari, Mohsen (11 May 2021). "A New Venting Valve for Anti-colic Nursing Bottles". CMBES Proceedings. 44. ISSN 2371-9516. Retrieved 20 Dec 2021.
  46. ^ Brown, Craig East.; Magnuson, Bengt (Baronial 2000). "On the physics of the infant feeding canteen and center ear sequela: Ear disease in infants tin be associated with bottle feeding". International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 54 (one): xiii–twenty. doi:10.1016/S0165-5876(00)00330-X. PMID 10960691. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  47. ^ Fewtrell, MS; Kennedy, K.; Nicholl, R.; Khakoo, A.; Lucas, A. (16 March 2012). "Infant feeding canteen pattern, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial". BMC Inquiry Notes. five (1): 150. doi:x.1186/1756-0500-5-150. ISSN 1756-0500. PMC3328286. PMID 22424116. Retrieved half-dozen December 2021.
  48. ^ Francis, Jimi; Rogers, Kristy; Dickton, Darby; Twedt, Roxanna; Pardini, Ron (April 2012). "Decreasing retinol and α-tocopherol concentrations in human milk and infant formula using varied bottle systems: Decreasing retinol and α-tocopherol in milk using varied bottle systems". Maternal & Child Diet. 8 (2): 215–224. doi:ten.1111/j.1740-8709.2010.00279.x. PMC6860793. PMID 21083843.
  49. ^ a b c d e f Pados, Britt Frisk; Park, Jinhee; Thoyre, Suzanne M.; Estrem, Hayley; Nix, W. Brant (July 2016). "Milk Flow Rates from bottle nipples used subsequently hospital discharge". MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 41 (4): 237–243. doi:ten.1097/NMC.0000000000000244. PMC5033656. PMID 27008466.
  50. ^ "Feeding a Child with a Cleft Lip or Crack Palate - Pediatric Crack and Craniofacial Center - Golisano Children's Hospital - Academy of Rochester Medical Center". Golisano Children'southward Infirmary. University of Rochester Medical Center. Retrieved 20 Dec 2021.
  51. ^ "Homepage". www.smanutrition.co.uk.
  52. ^ "Disinfect vs. Sterilize: Differences, Uses, and More". Healthline. 26 February 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  53. ^ "Sterilising baby bottles". United Kingdom National Health Service. 7 Dec 2020. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  54. ^ "Bottle Feeding" (PDF). wch.sa.gov.au. Women's and Children's Infirmary and Government of Southward Australia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-04-23. Retrieved 2016-04-01 . Printed Nov 2008
  55. ^ a b "Cleaning and sterilising baby bottles". www.pregnancybirthbaby.org.au. Healthdirect Australia. 24 May 2021. Retrieved xiv December 2021.
  56. ^ "Why sterilisation is necessary" (PDF). Philips Commonwealth of australia . Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  57. ^ "Bottle-feeding: cleaning and sterilising equipment". Raising Children Network. Raising Children Network (Australia) Express. Retrieved fourteen December 2021.
  58. ^ "How to Make clean, Sanitize, and Shop Infant Feeding Items". Centers for Affliction Command and Prevention. United states Government. 26 October 2020. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  59. ^ "Should Yous Sterilize Your Babe'south Bottles?". WebMD . Retrieved 14 Dec 2021.
  60. ^ "Best practices for baby canteen sterilization". Texas Children's Infirmary . Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  61. ^ "03.05.06 - Infant Feeding Procedures". Illinois Department of Human Services. 2011. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  62. ^ "Diet Guideline Salubrious Infants and Young Children Rubber Preparation and Handling of Infant Formula" (PDF). Alberta Health Services. 2015. Retrieved 14 Dec 2021.
  63. ^ a b c Rothstein, Jessica D.; Mendoza, Alejandra Llican; Cabrera, Lilia Z.; Pachas, Jessica; Calderón, Maritza; Pajuelo, Mónica J.; Caulfield, Laura E.; Winch, Peter J.; Gilman, Robert H. (3 April 2019). "Household Contamination of Baby Bottles and Opportunities to Improve Bottle Hygiene in Peri-Urban Lima, Republic of peru". The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 100 (four): 988–997. doi:ten.4269/ajtmh.18-0301. PMC6447096. PMID 30834885.
  64. ^ Anderson, J. A. D.; Gatherer, A. (4 Apr 1970). "Hygiene of Infant-feeding Utensils. Practices and Standards in the Home". BMJ. two (5700): xx–23. doi:10.1136/bmj.two.5700.xx. PMC1699766. PMID 5440567. Retrieved 14 Dec 2021.
  65. ^ Byrd-Bredbenner, Carol; Berning, Jacqueline; Martin-Biggers, Jennifer; Quick, Virginia (2013). "Food Safety in Home Kitchens: A Synthesis of the Literature". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 10 (9): 4060–4085. doi:x.3390/ijerph10094060. ISSN 1661-7827. PMC3799528. PMID 24002725.
  66. ^ Redmond, Elizabeth C; Griffith, Christopher J; Riley, Steven (March 2009). "Contamination of bottles used for feeding reconstituted powdered babe formula and implications for public health". Perspectives in Public Health. 129 (2): 85–94. doi:10.1177/1757913908101606. PMID 19354201. S2CID 34509523. Retrieved fourteen December 2021.
  67. ^ Ayaz, F.; Ayaz, South. B.; Furrukh, M.; Matee, Due south. (2017). "Cleaning practices and contamination status of infant feeding canteen contents and teats in Rawalpindi, Pakistan". Pakistan Journal of Pathology. 28 (1): thirteen–twenty. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  68. ^ "Safe preparation, storage and handling of powdered infant formula Guidelines" (PDF). World Health Organization. World Health Arrangement in collaboration with Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2007. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  69. ^ Cho, Tae Jin; Hwang, Ji Yeon; Kim, Hye Won; Kim, Yong Ki; Il Kwon, Jeong; Kim, Immature Jun; Lee, Kwang Won; Kim, Sun Ae; Rhee, Min Suk (5 July 2019). "Underestimated Risks of Infantile Infectious disease from the Caregiver'due south Typical Treatment Practices of Infant Formula". Scientific Reports. nine (1): 9799. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.9799C. doi:ten.1038/s41598-019-46181-0. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC6611816. PMID 31278304. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  70. ^ "WHO and UNICEF issue new guidance to promote breastfeeding in wellness facilities globally". UNICEF . Retrieved fourteen Dec 2021.
  71. ^ "Know the flow, don't go with the flow". Pediatric Feeding News. 2014-06-08. Retrieved 2018-12-27 .
  72. ^ "Drinks and cups for babies and toddlers". nhs.united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland. 2017-12-21. Retrieved 2018-12-27 .
  73. ^ "Weaning from the Canteen". www.aap.org. American University of Pediatrics. Retrieved 2018-12-27 .
  74. ^ Lisa Enger. "Patient pedagogy: Weaning from breastfeeding (Beyond the Basics)". UpToDate . Retrieved 2018-12-27 .
  75. ^ Anil, Sukumaran; Anand, Pradeep South. (18 July 2017). "Early Childhood Caries: Prevalence, Run a risk Factors, and Prevention". Frontiers in Pediatrics. 5: 157. doi:10.3389/fped.2017.00157. PMC5514393. PMID 28770188.
  76. ^ Lackey, Kimberly A.; Fehrenkamp, Bethaney D.; Stride, Ryan M.; Williams, Janet E.; Meehan, Courtney L.; McGuire, Marking A.; McGuire, Michelle Chiliad. (11 Oct 2021). "Breastfeeding Beyond 12 Months: Is There Bear witness for Health Impacts?". Annual Review of Nutrition. 41 (1): 283–308. doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-043020-011242. ISSN 0199-9885. PMID 34115518. S2CID 235412156. Retrieved sixteen December 2021.
  77. ^ "BSI British Standards Alphabetize". bsonline.techindex.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2011-05-13.
  78. ^ a b Mo, Chuiyan (10 March 2021). "Infant Feeding Bottle Standards & Regulations in the U.s.a.". Compliance Gate . Retrieved xxx November 2021.
  79. ^ "Baby Bottles". Consumer Watch . Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  80. ^ Center for Food Safety and Practical Diet (20 Dec 2019). "FDA Problems Guidance on Food Contact Substances for Utilize with Babe Formula and/or Human Milk". FDA . Retrieved xxx November 2021.
  81. ^ Center for Food Safety and Practical Diet (10 April 2020). "Once Infant Arrives from Food Safety for Moms to Be". FDA . Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  82. ^ Office of Regulatory Affairs (2005). "Compliance Policy Guide: CPG Sec 500.450 Volatile Northward-Nitrosamines in Rubber Infant Bottle Nipples". FDA.
  83. ^ Weston, Roderick J. (1 March 1985). "Volatile Nitrosamine Levels in Safety Teats and Pacifiers Available in New Zealand". Journal of Analytical Toxicology. ix (2): 89–90. doi:ten.1093/jat/ix.2.89. OSTI 6997326. PMID 3990253. Retrieved twenty December 2021.
  84. ^ Park, Se-Jong; Jeong, Mi-Jin; Park, So-Ra; Choi, Jae Chun; Choi, Heeju; Kim, MeeKyung (10 April 2018). "Release of North-nitrosamines and N-nitrosatable substances from baby bottle teats and rubber kitchen tools in Korea". Nutrient Science and Biotechnology. 27 (5): 1519–1524. doi:ten.1007/s10068-018-0373-6. ISSN 1226-7708. PMC6170278. PMID 30319863.
  85. ^ a b Gore, Andrea C.; Patisaul, Heather B. (Oct 2010). "Neuroendocrine Disruption: Historical Roots, Electric current Progress, Questions for the Future". Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 31 (iv): 395–399. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.07.003. ISSN 0091-3022. PMC2964387. PMID 20638407.
  86. ^ a b c d "Timeline: BPA from Invention to Stage-Out". Environmental Working Grouping. Apr 22, 2008. Retrieved 1 Dec 2021.
  87. ^ "Baby Bottles and Bisphenol A (BPA)". HealthyChildren.org.
  88. ^ Kay, Jane (24 June 2011). "SAN FRANCISCO / Lawmaker wants state to follow city's lead with 'toxic toy' ban / Nib would bar certain chemicals in products". The San Francisco Relate.
  89. ^ a b c d Vogel, Sarah A. (Nov 2009). "The Politics of Plastics: The Making and Unmaking of Bisphenol A "Prophylactic"". American Journal of Public Health. 99 (S3): S559–S566. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.159228. PMC2774166. PMID 19890158.
  90. ^ a b Halden, Rolf U. (1 March 2010). "Plastics and Health Risks". Annual Review of Public Health. 31 (1): 179–194. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103714. ISSN 0163-7525. PMID 20070188. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  91. ^ Rozek, Laura Southward.; Dolinoy, Dana C.; Sartor, Maureen A.; Omenn, Gilbert Due south. (18 March 2014). "Epigenetics: Relevance and Implications for Public Health". Annual Review of Public Wellness. 35 (1): 105–122. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182513. ISSN 0163-7525. PMC4480875. PMID 24641556. Retrieved thirty November 2021.
  92. ^ Vandenberg, Laura N.; Maffini, Maricel V.; Sonnenschein, Carlos; Rubin, Beverly S.; Soto, Ana M. (1 February 2009). "Bisphenol-A and the Great Divide: A Review of Controversies in the Field of Endocrine Disruption". Endocrine Reviews. 30 (1): 75–95. doi:10.1210/er.2008-0021. PMC2647705. PMID 19074586.
  93. ^ "BPA Bans and Restrictions in Nutrient Contact Materials". Société Générale de Surveillance. 2018. Retrieved thirty November 2021.
  94. ^ "Bisphenol A: European union ban on baby bottles to enter into force tomorrow". European Commission - European Commission. 31 May 2011. Retrieved 1 Dec 2021.
  95. ^ "Umstrittene Chemikalie: EU-Behörde senkt Grenzwert für Bisphenol A". Der Spiegel (in German language). January 21, 2015. Retrieved January 21, 2015.
  96. ^ a b "Brazil to ban baby bottles containing BPA". Chemical Watch. 15 September 2011. Retrieved 1 December 2021.
  97. ^ Tavernise, Sabrina (17 July 2012). "F.D.A. Makes Information technology Official: BPA Can't Be Used in Infant Bottles and Cups". The New York Times . Retrieved 1 December 2021.
  98. ^ DeNoon, Daniel J. "FDA Bans BPA in Infant Bottles". WebMD . Retrieved one December 2021.
  99. ^ "Argentina bans BPA in baby bottles". Chemical Watch. 24 April 2012. Retrieved one December 2021.
  100. ^ "Southward Korea to ban BPA in baby and toddler FCMs". Chemical Watch. 12 September 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2021.
  101. ^ "India to test consumer products and FCMs for BPA presence". Chemical Watch. 18 November 2020. Retrieved one Dec 2021.
  102. ^ a b c d Stevens, Emily E; Patrick, Thelma E; Pickler, Rita (1 Jan 2009). "A History of Infant Feeding". Journal of Perinatal Education. xviii (two): 32–39. doi:10.1624/105812409X426314. PMC2684040. PMID 20190854.
  103. ^ Brown, Amy (1 July 2018). "Affiliate 9 Sociological and Cultural Influences upon Breastfeeding". Breastfeeding and Breast Milk – from Biochemistry to Impact. Georg Thieme Verlag KG.
  104. ^ a b Fildes, Valerie (1995). "Chapter 4 The Culture and Biology of Breastfeeding: An Historical Review of Western Europe". In Stuart-Macadam, Patricia; Dettwyler, Katherine (eds.). Breastfeeding : Bicultural Perspectives. Somerset: Taylor and Francis. pp. 101–126. ISBN9781351530743 . Retrieved three December 2021.
  105. ^ a b c d Castilho, S. Diez; Barros Filho, A. de Azevedo (2014). "Historical aspects of formula feeding". In Preedy, Victor R.; Watson, Ronald Ross; Zibadi, Sherma (eds.). Handbook of dietary and nutritional aspects of bottle feeding. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers. pp. 17–33. ISBN9789086867776 . Retrieved 1 Dec 2021.
  106. ^ a b c d eastward f Greenberg, Martin H.; Smith, George F.; Vidyasagar, Dharmapuri (1980). "Neonatal Feeding". Historical Review and Recent Advances in Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine. Mead Johnson Nutritional Division. Retrieved xxx November 2021.
  107. ^ a b Wilke, Carolyn (21 July 2021). "What did ancient people eat? Scientists find new clues in old pottery". Knowable Magazine. doi:ten.1146/knowable-052221-1 . Retrieved thirty November 2021.
  108. ^ a b Dunne, J.; Rebay-Salisbury, K.; Salisbury, R. B.; Frisch, A.; Walton-Doyle, C.; Evershed, R. P. (2019-09-25). "Milk of ruminants in ceramic baby bottles from prehistoric kid graves" (PDF). Nature. 574 (7777): 246–248. Bibcode:2019Natur.574..246D. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1572-x. hdl:1983/fe4e378a-bfc6-4b0a-8c00-7ef4a49dba0d. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 31554964. S2CID 202760220.
    • "Scientists unearth prehistoric 'baby bottles' in Deutschland". Deutsche Welle. 2019-09-25.
  109. ^ a b Peringer, Annabelle (2014). "The history of infant bottles". Alimentarium Magazine . Retrieved 30 Nov 2021.
  110. ^ a b c d Wickes, I. K. (1 Oct 1953). "A History of Infant Feeding: Part 4--Nineteenth Century Continued" (PDF). Athenaeum of Disease in Childhood. 28 (141): 416–422. doi:10.1136/adc.28.141.416. PMC1988630. PMID 13105394. Retrieved thirty Nov 2021.
  111. ^ a b Harris, Charles Due south. "Photographic proof" (PDF). The Federation of Historical Bottle Collectors . Retrieved 30 Nov 2021.
  112. ^ a b Davenport, Romola J. (September 2021). "Mortality, migration and epidemiological change in English cities, 1600–1870" (PDF). International Journal of Paleopathology. 34: 37–49. doi:10.1016/j.ijpp.2021.05.009. PMC7611108. PMID 34146819. Retrieved three December 2021.
  113. ^ Davenport, Romola Jane (2 January 2019). "Infant-feeding practices and baby survival by familial wealth in London, 1752–1812". The History of the Family. 24 (1): 174–206. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2019.1580601. PMC6474727. PMID 31058272.
  114. ^ Fildes, Valerie (2019). "1 Breast-Feeding Practices During Industrialisation 1800–1919". In Falkner, Frank (ed.). Infant and Child Nutrition Worldwide: Bug and Perspectives. CRC Press. ISBN978-0367450489 . Retrieved three December 2021.
  115. ^ a b Knodel, John; Kintner, Hallie (1 November 1977). "The impact of breast feeding patterns on the biometric assay of babe mortality". Demography. fourteen (4): 391–409. doi:10.2307/2060586. JSTOR 2060586. PMID 913727. S2CID 37803365. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
  116. ^ Castilho, Silvia Diez; Barros Filho, Antonio de Azevedo; Cocetti, Monize (June 2010). "Evolução histórica dos utensílios empregados para alimentar lactentes não amamentados (Historical development of utensils used to feed non breastfed infants)". Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. xv (suppl 1): 1401–1410. doi:10.1590/s1413-81232010000700050. PMID 20640300. Retrieved thirty Nov 2021.
  117. ^ "Addenda 162: The Biberon, A New Feeding-Canteen". The Retrospect of Practical Medicine and Surgery. Adee & Estabrook. 23 (July): 301. 1851. Retrieved xxx November 2021.
  118. ^ Bogucki, E. (2007). History of Nursing Bottles. American Collectors of Infant Feeders. Archived from the original on July 1, 2017. Retrieved February 27, 2014.
  119. ^ "The Kickoff Measured Century: Timeline: Data - Mortality". PBS . Retrieved 3 December 2021. Prior to 1900, infant mortality rates of two and three hundred [per 1000 live births] obtained throughout the earth.
  120. ^ Williams, Naomi; Mooney, Graham (August 1994). "Infant bloodshed in an 'Age of Great Cities': London and the English provincial cities compared, c. 1840–1910". Continuity and Alter. 9 (2): 185–212. doi:10.1017/S0268416000002265. ISSN 1469-218X. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
  121. ^ "Populations By – Atlas of Victorian and Edwardian Population". Populations Past. University of Cambridge. Retrieved 3 Dec 2021.
  122. ^ a b c "The history of the feeding bottle". A diary of a lesbian family unit . Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  123. ^ Barrett, Ronald; Kuzawa, Christopher Due west.; McDade, Thomas; Armelagos, George J. (October 1998). "Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases: The Third Epidemiologic Transition". Annual Review of Anthropology. 27 (1): 247–271. doi:x.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.247. Retrieved 3 Dec 2021.
  124. ^ Preston, Samuel H.; Haines, Michael R. (1991). Fatal Years: Kid Mortality in Belatedly Nineteenth-Century America (PDF). Princeton University Press. Retrieved three December 2021.
  125. ^ "1920'south Pyrex Infant Bottle". Collectors Weekly . Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  126. ^ "Come across how vintage baby bottles, infant nursers & feeding accessories have changed over the years - Click Americana". Click Americana. 21 June 2020. Retrieved 3 Dec 2021.
  127. ^ "Google Patents: Inventor Adda M. Allen". patents.google.com . Retrieved 6 December 2021.
  128. ^ Stokowski, Laura A. "Quiz: A Nurse Invented That? Inventiveness, Ingenuity, and Innovation in Nurses". Medscape . Retrieved 6 Dec 2021.
  129. ^ Vance, Jacqueline (September 30, 2014). "A nurse invented that! (Merely nigh likely didn't go credit for it)". The Existent Nurse Jackie . Retrieved 6 December 2021.
  130. ^ U.S. patent 2442656 A, "Nursing nipple for bottles", American J.Westward. Less in 1948 (www.google.ca/patents/US2442656, accessed February 27, 2014)
  131. ^ U.Southward. patent 2747573 A, "Valved nursing nipple", issued to Westward.A. Schaich of Owens-Illinois in 1956 (www.google.ca/patents/US2747573, accessed February 27, 2014)
  132. ^ E.g., run across U.S. patent 6032810 A, "Jumpsuit nipple/collar for nursers and the like", issued to the Americans Thousand.A. Gilbertson, B. J. Meyers, Due east.A. Raleigh, and Thou.S. Stowe of Gerber Products Company in 2000 (world wide web.google.ca/patents/US6032810), and U.S. patent 20120248056 A1, "Teat unit", issued to the Swiss R. Fischer, Eastward. Furrer, and B. Emmenegger of Medela Holding Ag in 2012 (www.google.ca/patents/US20120248056). Accessed February 27, 2014.
  133. ^ E.g., run into U.S. patent U.s.a. 7775394 B2, "Opening-force-maximizing device of an underpressure-activated valve for a drinking container", issued to the Norwegian M. Næsje of Smartseal As in 2010 (world wide web.google.ca/patents/US7775394). Accessed February 27, 2014.
  134. ^ Global Babe Bottle Market Size & Share Report, 2019-2025. Grand View Research, Inc. 2019. Retrieved six December 2021.
  135. ^ Taylor, Jennifer (Nov 3, 2011). "North American Culture: Undermining Breastfeeding (Part i of 3)". Gimmicky Ob/Gyn . Retrieved 6 December 2021.
  136. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-07-27. Retrieved 2006-09-21 . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  137. ^ "American Academy of Pediatrics, AAP Policy on Breastfeeding and Use of Human being Milk, see www2.aap.org accessed February 28, 2014". Archived from the original on 2014-04-25. Retrieved 2014-02-28 .
  138. ^ a b c Breastfeeding, Section On (March one, 2012). "Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk". Pediatrics. 129 (3): e827–e841. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3552. PMID 22371471 – via pediatrics.aappublications.org.
  139. ^ Tully DB, Jones F, Tully MR (May 2001). "Donor milk: what'south in information technology and what's not". Journal of Human Lactation. 17 (2): 152–5. doi:10.1177/089033440101700212. PMID 11847831. S2CID 8798973. [ permanent expressionless link ]
  140. ^ "Fearless Formula Feeder - Infant Feeding Back up". www.fearlessformulafeeder.com.
  141. ^ Barston, Due south. (2012). Bottled Upwardly: How the Style We Feed Babies Has Come to Define Maternity, and Why It Shouldn't. University of California Press. ISBN9780520270237 . Retrieved February 28, 2014.

External links [edit]

funkbeas1989.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_bottle

0 Response to "What Was the Fake Liquid Inside 1980s Baby Bottles"

Enviar um comentário

Subscrever: Enviar feedback (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel